What are the International Relations in East Asia and the Chances of a Multipolar World Order?


East Asia
In his bookThe Post-American Worldthe American author Fareed Zakaria argues that the unipolar model, which has dominated the International Relations for the last twenty years, could gradually be substituted by an international order which strongly resembles multipolar. In the same time, however, the American advantage over the new contestants for global power would still be clearly visible. These expectations were fueled by the boom of science and technology, the rapid economic development and politically aware population, which contributed to the shift of wealth from West to East in recent decades.




 The contestants for global power 
  
At a first glance, it is easy to point out the potential future powers of eventual multipolar order- states like China, India, Brazil, Indonesia and even Russia, seem to have a chance to create successful models of development and attain higher international status, turning themselves into factors of greater global importance.
 The question is how today’s global leader, the US, will react to the emergence of so many other countries? America is the global hegemon and it will have to face a hard choice- how to shape the future world when it still has the greatest impact in international affairs? Should the United States prepare itself for a system based on mutual respect and mutual responsibilities searching for constructive solutions of the global problems or should it jealously protect its status of the only global superpower and to oppose to any attempt seeking to challenge its dominance? 
The latter scenario could plunge the world into even more chaotic setting, creating mistrust, indignation and separation, while the former scenario would be very serious challenge for the international community as a whole and under the condition that the US will accept such a development. But does the United States really face such a dilemma?
Among the above mentioned contestants for greater global recognition, we can easily distinguish India and especially China. The stable growth of the Chinese power for the last thirty years has lead to deep shift in East Asian affairs. In regional scope, many countries are experiencing great economic uprising- the ASEAN countries, China, South Korea, Taiwan and others.

Despite the fact that the Japanese economy was badly shaken by the global financial crisis, its efficiency remains unmatched in Asia and it is likely to remain so. The unprecedented economic development in Asia-Pacific creates global implications. For the relatively short period from the end of World War Two until today, hundreds of millions of people went out of the absolute poverty thanks to the economic development of their countries and their involvement in the global markets.

The fast economic rise of the East Asian countries is not the only regional characteristic- the common international insecurity, which dominates despite the efforts of the local governments, is also worth paying attention. The lack of solid institutions for cooperation might appear a serious obstacle for maintaining the fast economic growth which the regional countries enjoyed for decades.

The importance of USA, China and Japan


Undeniably, the most important players in East Asian affairs are the US, China and Japan. The relations between them are of extreme importance for the development of regional politics. In this series we'll try to reveal the processes that shape the relations between the three great powers, their suitability for cooperation and the weak points where collision is possible.
The issue with the mutual mistrust between the East Asian countries is a serious one and a solution might be found through multilateral institutions building, in which they may find consensus on mutual problems. Without the involvement of the US, China and Japan, the most powerful factors in the region, all initiatives will seem incomplete.
The trilateral relations between the United States, China and Japan are of a fundamental importance for the security and stability in Asia-Pacific but the conflict between them is not impossible. Today’s gravity center of the international system is of course the US. It holds much more capabilities and diplomatic force, which in some cases narrows the choice in front of China and Japan.
The interactions between the three states create dynamic changes in the region and the relations between them are so complex and mutually binding, that a conflict could result in gigantic damage for the participants and the others. Such a scenario is strongly unwanted but that does not mean its inevitable.
 
The existence of serious problems could be tackled through responsible attitude by the three countries, using the advantages of the modern diplomacy and by the realization that the benefits of a cooperation would be much greater than choosing destructive and selfish approach towards common issues.

Security Issues in East Asia

There are many reasons to worry about the uncertainty in East Asia. At a glance some of the problems in East Asia seem so serious that a solution would be very hard to find. There are big historical issues, straining the relations between the three major powers and their impact on the contemporary events. The challenges, inherited by the Cold War- the division of Korea and the Taiwan issue, form a dangerous mix with a challenge of a new type- supplying the fast emerging local economies with enough resources to sustain their growth.

East Asia is a region with great inner dynamics, charged with multiple problems, which is an indication that an escalation of tensions could cause serious disruption in the regional security. The choice for the countries in the Far East is to engage in non-constructive race in selfish defense of their vital interests, or to look for mutually acceptable solutions, although taking the risk of incomplete results regarding their own interests. 
First of all, however, this decision will have to be made by the most important regional powers- the US, China and Japan, whose relations will determine the direction of the region’s future.